Critical thinking on vocabulary and labeling

Dear Editor:

Viruses were typically named after where or what they originated from. When the current virus first appeared in Wuhan, China, it was called the China Virus. Following objective scientific labeling, it was called SARS-CoV-WIV (Wuhan Institute of Virology.) It was somehow changed to SARS-CoV-2.

Since the late 1700s, “vaccine” meant a substance used to protect against acquiring a disease. We were told the only thing that could protect us from getting, spreading and dying from the current virus was “the vaccine.”

To be “vaccinated,” you had to get one or two shots. Data from around the world shows the majority of those getting infected/re-infected and spreading the virus are those who have been injected (worldindata.com). The CDC changed the definition of “vaccine” to remove the condition of protection. “Vaccinated” now includes unlimited boosters, depending on the bureaucrat. As a bonus, the CDC just admitted masks don’t work for this virus after two years of demanding them.

If the CDC changes the definition of “vaccine,” bureaucrats change the definition of “vaccinated,” and the CEO of Pfizer stating the shots do “little, if anything,” are there really such things as “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” people?

Terry Todd

Enterprise